• Source: https://innovationatwork.ieee.org/the-world-needs-more-women-engineers-celebrate-international-women-in-engineering-day-june-23/

    Empowering Women Engineers

    Challenges and Solutions Then and Now

     

    By Yayan Tan

  • Introduction

     

    Engineering has developed rapidly in the UK and has been one of the main engines of the UK economy. UK was ranked the 4th among 131 economies for innovation in 2020, according to the Global Innovation Index (GII) [1]. Around 27% of the enterprises in the UK are engineering-related and they contributed to the employment of 5.6 million people in the UK[2]. Engineering higher education in the UK has also been well-known in the world. Three of the top-ten engineering universities are located in the UK. However, it has also been obvious that the gender imbalance in engineering has been relatively high, compared with other industries. In 2016, women only accounted for 21% of the engineering workforce, compared with 47% in all industries on average [3]. The development and contribution of engineering can be improved if more women can be involved. It is estimated that by improving the gender equality in work in the UK, there is a potential to add £150 billion to GDP forecasts by 2025, especially in involving more women to work in high-productivity sectors like STEM. The importance of gender equality in engineering is actually well recognised and it is important to take further actions to improve the status of women engineers nowadays.

     

    Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate how gender equality was improved in the past, and if there are any lessons learnt which can be reflected and improve gender equality at the present. The past in this project refers particularly to the time between WW1 and WW2 because it was discovered that women engineers started to release the importance of gender equality and took various approaches to promote women’s status in engineering.

     

  • The Past

    Between WW1 and WW2

    The time period between World War One (WW1) and World War Two (WW2) were investigated because this was when women engineers started to become a group of people in the UK society, instead of individuals.

     

     

     

     

    Women Engineers in WW1

     

    Before WW1, in 1911, there were no official records of women working as engineers and women only accounted for less than 1% in the engineering industry. However, at the start of the 20th century, there were records of a very small number of women who did have a chance to be educated in engineering. The critical turning point was WW1. During WW1, when men went to war to protect the country, the burden of engineering production has lain on the women’s shoulders. Many women were employed to fill men’s positions in the engineering industry. They were allowed. For example, more than 30,000 women were employed at the Royal Arsenal in Woolwich, London in 1916. Many women worked in burgeoning munitions factories, and transports, in which they drove buses and trains, and they helped construct machinery. Although women were regarded as technicians instead of engineers, because of the demand from the industry, they were offered training opportunities. Before WW1, women were barred from apprenticeship and so they were barred from becoming an engineer. During the war, training for women was developed. In 1915, Loughborough Technical School functioned as a training centre for munitions workers. It offered courses such as gauge-making, draughtsmanship, welding, pattern-making, and aero-engine testing [1]. It trained 1,338 women during the war, which was nearly twice that of men.

     

    Women working with machinery:
    Source: https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2014/06/ww1-women-engineers-in-the-first-world-war/
    Source: https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2014/06/ww1-women-engineers-in-the-first-world-war/

     

    The Women Engineers' Society

     

    However, when men came back from the battlefield, women were forced to return their positions to men in 1919. Due to the Restoration of Pre-War Practices Act, women were forced to leave their jobs and create occupations for men who returned from the war. This was enforced by the trade unions. Companies were prosecuted if they retain these jobs for women. Although later in 1919, with the approval of the Sex Disqualification Removal Act later this year, women were allowed to join professional bodies and work in companies, the situation was not improved because it was simply an enabling act instead of enforcing one. As a result, women engineers realised that they need to stick together and fight for their rights. The Women Engineers’ Society (WES) was founded in 1919 to fight for women engineers’ positions and encouraged them to fight. The society published the 1st issue of the journal called The Women Engineers in 1919, which provided examples of successful women engineers and information about recent development and education in engineering. In the very first issue of this journal, WES introduced its original purpose: present the information of full training available at that time for women to become engineers; find suitable job positions for its members; establish clubs and reading rooms (libraries); provide lectures and social events.

     

    It is worth mentioning that WES is still an active organisation today and still plays an important role in promoting gender equality and encouraging more young women to join engineering.

     

     

    Attendees to the WES conference 1920s:
    Source:https://www.theiet.org/membership/library-archives/the-iet-archives/online-exhibitions/women-and-engineering/history-of-the-womens-engineering-society/
    broken image

     

    Women Engineers' Education - Case Study

     

    Between 1920 and 1930, more women were able to attend universities to study engineering. The first women to receive engineering degrees appeared during this time. However, higher education was still unreachable to the vast majority of women engineers at that time. Therefore, to demonstrate the attempts to bring engineering education to ordinary women at that time, the case study of the Electrical Association of Women (EAW) will be demonstrated.

     

    In 1924, Mrs. M.L. Matthews, a member of the WES council, had the idea of a scheme popularising the domestic use of electricity. At first, she presented the idea to the Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE) in a paper to meet the requirement for associate membership of the Institution but it was rejected. Then, Mrs. Matthews submitted it to the Electrical Development Association, and it was also refused. She next submitted her paper to the WES, and it was finally accepted. Between 1924 and 1925, a new committee was formed by some of the WES council members and one of two people from the outside. This new organisation was called the Electrical Association for Women (EAW) [2]. The organisation’s primary function was to educate women about the domestic use of electricity. In 1926, this organisation started to reach women at home by publishing a journal that introduced them to the recent development of relevant engineering technologies. This journal also introduced leading women engineers, reports on the organisation’s events, some ‘helpful hints for homemakers’, and informed women about education opportunities. In 1933, the Electrical Housecraft School, containing a model labour-saving kitchen, was opened at the EAW’s home in Kensington Court. The school demonstrated various systems of lighting, heating, and different types of switches, plugs, and outlets [3]. The organisation also provided textbooks, courses, examinations, and diplomas for women, to help make sure their opinions could be treated as professional ones.

     

    Although the education involved in this case study is not as professional as higher education, it does reveal the potential to spread the influence of engineering knowledge to many women. And people can only imagine how many housewives and daughters were inspired by this kind of education.

     

     

    Electrical Association for Women Housecraft School:

    Source:https://www.theiet.org/membership/library-archives/the-iet-archives/online-exhibitions/women-and-engineering/the-electrical-association-for-women-educating-women/ IET Archives ref. NAEST 93/08/23/11.
    broken image

    Electrical Association for Women Diploma in Electrical Housecraft certificate:

    Source: https://www.theiet.org/membership/library-archives/the-iet-archives/online-exhibitions/women-and-engineering/the-electrical-association-for-women-educating-women/
    IET Archives ref. NAEST 93/04/02/01
    broken image
    EAW ‘How it works’ leaflet:
    Source: https://www.theiet.org/membership/library-archives/the-iet-archives/online-exhibitions/women-and-engineering/electrical-association-for-women-history-and-policy/ IET Archives ref NAEST 33/02/11/22
    broken image

    The engineering experience for women in WW1 and the growth of women engineers’ education afterward has provided opportunities and environments for more women to enter the engineering industry. With the continuous efforts from women engineers and other parties, the status of women engineers was improved between WW1 and WW2. According to a statistical record, in 1951, almost 20% of the workforce in engineering-related industries were women (ref). But it’s worth mentioning that in 1951, many women engineer’s works were still defined as ‘clerical’, and professional women engineers were still a minority.

  • The Present

    In the present day, although progress has been made through our history and young women can study for an engineering degree and enter the industry and academia with fewer obstacles, gender inequality in engineering is also a significant issue.

    The Industry

     

    One of the main problems women are facing in the engineering industry is that women are underrepresented in leadership positions in both academia and the industry. This means that there has been a shortage of women engineer role models in our society. According to a statistical record, only 4% of fellows of the Royal Academy of Engineering in 2014, and only 13% of Board Directors in FTSE100 companies in STEM sectors were female in 2012. This may be one of the reasons why women engineers have been underrepresented in engineering overall. Without a fair proportion of women in directory roles, changes in the higher level of the industry could be difficult to be aware of or implemented.
     
    Another challenge faced by women engineers is that their costs of career breaks are naturally higher than men. They need to have maternity leave when they give birth to babies, and childcare has been treated like a women’s job. This is a common problem for many industries, but career break is particularly unfavourable in engineering because the industry believes that technologies are changing very quickly and once someone takes a break, their knowledge and skills would be gone [1]. Returning to work is reported to be either difficult or very difficult for 61 percent of STEM professionals on a career break and women are bearing more pressure from this challenge. However, Natalie Desty, director of STEM Returners, said: “There is a perception that a career break automatically leads to a deterioration of skills, but the reality is that many people on a career break keep themselves up to date with their industry; are able to refresh their skills easily when back in work, and have developed new transferable skills that would actually benefit their employers. STEM organisations are clearly missing a major opportunity to get highly skilled, talented females back into the industry.” As the engineering industry is still having a huge demand for talents, it is beneficial to exploit the potential of returners.
     
    Another major challenge for women engineers in industry is the gender pay gap. This comes from the gender gap in career level and the unequal salary starting point. The gender pay gap increases after the age of 50-60. This may come from the fact that it has been more difficult for women to enter leadership positions as their ages increase. An unequal salary starting point may lead to a greater difference in income with time between male and female engineers because the pay growth is calculated as the percentage of income rise compared with the existing salary. And gender pay gap increases for a certain proportion of women after their maternity break. Despite all these disadvantages in the gender pay gap for women engineers, it is important to clarify that the gender pay gap issue is actually less significant in the engineering industry. According to statistics, the gender pay gap in engineering is around 6% smaller than that of all UK workers and although 14% more male engineers receive bonuses than females, the gender bonus gap is a lot smaller in engineering [2]. This indicates the potential to attract more women engineers to the industry by balancing the gender income gap.  

    The Education

     

    Education has always been a key in gender issues. In The Women Engineer journal in 1920, Hetty G Grouse wrote: ‘I am quite convinced that if we are to evolve women engineers, we must train them early’. In nowadays, attracting more girls to study engineering and educate them well is still one of the major priorities for improving gender equality in engineering. Currently, although girls are having equal rights in education in the UK, female engineering students are still the minority in UK higher education and apprenticeship [3]. The problems occur long before higher education. Girls are already underrepresented in STEM-related GCSE and A-level subjects, despite the fact that they are not underperformed in these subjects compared with boys. 90% of girls believe that engineering is suitable for both boys and girls, however, only 20% - 35% of them believe engineering is a desirable career. They are not having faith in choosing engineering as a career.

     

    The reason for this issue is rather complex. One of them is the lack of female engineer role models in society. According to a survey, around 40% of women engineers are inspired by a family member working as an engineer. This means that having someone being there as an engineer in childhood and at different stages of their growth is crucial. Therefore, it is very important for girls who are not living in an engineering family to access or at least be aware of engineering role models in society. Secondly, girls are not exposed to enough information about engineering when they make their career decisions. Statistics show that only 15% of women engineers chose their career paths based on career advisors’ suggestions. This indicates the lack of information about the engineering industry at schools overall. Moreover, engineering itself does not have a very attractive image to girls nowadays. The images of engineers nowadays often involve people wearing helmets and uniforms and doing heavy work in an untidy environment. However, it is no longer true now. Engineers can tackle different engineering problems in the industry with a computer, and the increasingly high level of automatic allows the hard work in manufacturing production lines to be done using different robotic arms. And the public needs to be aware of this, therefore it is becoming necessary for engineering to rebrand itself.

    Possible Solutions

     

    Gender equality in engineering is a very complex topic and it requires many generations of engineers and people from different parties to work together. Some suggested measures to tackle current gender inequality issues are listed as follows:

     

    1. Education is always the key. It is important for academia and the industry to outreach and bring them closer to girls, with projects, talks, and forums, etc. For example, more projects providing the experience of real-life engineering education/research/industry are useful for school students to gain a better understanding and hopefully interest in the field. However, the reality shows that the above measures can only reach students who are already interested in STEM. It is also important to actually outreach to students with potential interests and abilities to study engineering. One way to achieve this is to provide more information to teachers and parents. It helps when teachers, parents, and advisors have some understanding of engineering and provide their influence and recommendation to girls when they have to make their career decisions.
    2. Different parties in society need to acknowledge the value of engineering. It is true that engineering and women engineers have been developing products that make people’s lives better. Therefore, it is important not to forget about engineering when people talk about science and technology progression. Also, have women engineer role models who are recognised by the whole society is equally important. With more women engineers in leadership positions, the voice of women engineers can be better heard, and company or institutional policies can be more friendly to women engineers. It can also help to influence more male engineers to be aware of the welfare of their women colleagues or employees. To create a better working environment, it is important to keep transparency in the industry, for example in terms of recruitment and pay structure. Evidence has shown that the gender pay gap can be decreased in a more transparent organisation [2].
    3. It is crucial to keep the positive momentum when reaching gender equality in engineering. Official organisations such as the Women’s Engineering Society still play influential roles. It is more influential and effective when these organisations set up women engineer role models and make campaigns for engineering educations at school. As society now is different from what it was a hundred years ago, it is now essential to be diversified and involves all parties to reach this common goal of gender equality. Male engineers were able to speak up for women engineers' rights in the 1920s, the society is now ready to have more to join and share the burden of women engineers.
    [2] RAENG Gender Pay Gap report
    [3] EngineeringUK briefing: Gender disparity in engineering
  • Creating a Better Future

     

    No matter in the past or present, it’s all been about creating a better future. In the 1st issue of the journal The Women Engineers in 1919, there was an amazing piece of writing:

    broken image

    Here the author wrote a scene with an imagined conversation in a job interview in the future, where the interviewer, although had doubts about the ability of the female applicants, still had to offer her the job. This is somehow similar to the reality nowadays, and it reflects the positive momentum of gender equality in engineering throughout history.

     

    So what is the imagination of the future for our generation? It could be the same scene with less complicated conversations:

    broken image

    Because by then engineers will be assessed according to their knowledge and skills, not their genders.